Skip to content

Crawler operations

Standardize how you crawl without standardizing away expert judgment.

Give crawl configurations clear names, document the scope, keep the exports, and check whether each run completed reliably. Then decide which rows deserve attention, how reviewers challenge false positives, and how approved work reaches implementation and the client report.

Request access Explore the platform
01 / FindingCrawler operationsKeep the source close to the issue
02 / ReviewA person checks itSee who owns the call and what it covers
03 / Follow-upCheck the live resultA provider response and a public read-back are separate facts

What to look for

Get the answer without losing sight of where it came from.

01

Keep the crawl settings with the run

Record rendering, user agent, sources, exclusions, rate, authentication, and optional API dependencies.

02

Make sure the export supports the check

Confirm that every rule reads a requested export and a real column before trusting the issue count.

03

Keep raw data without making people review every row

Preserve the exports, then group the page-level findings for reviewers.

Put the guide to work

Understand the issue, check the page, and choose the next step.

The strongest audits leave room for context. Confirm what happened, rule out the common false positives, decide who owns the fix, and check the page again afterward.

Open the full check library
01

Keep the crawl settings with the run

Record rendering, user agent, sources, exclusions, rate, authentication, and optional API dependencies.

02

Make sure the export supports the check

Confirm that every rule reads a requested export and a real column before trusting the issue count.

03

Keep raw data without making people review every row

Preserve the exports, then group the page-level findings for reviewers.

From finding to follow-up

See where the work stands—and what still needs to happen.

  1. 01Found

    Netrix records the page and the issue it found.

  2. 02Reviewed

    Someone checks the finding in context.

  3. 03Approved

    The right person chooses what should change.

  4. 04Applied

    A supported connection accepts the change.

  5. 05Checked

    Netrix reads the public page again.

  6. 06Shared

    The report summarizes the audit and fixes currently marked applied.

A few things worth knowing

Netrix can prepare the work. Your team still makes the call.

  1. 01
    Nothing publishes itself

    AI drafts and supported SEO changes wait for an authorized person to act.

  2. 02
    A write is not proof

    Netrix records when a provider accepts a change, then checks the public page separately. If it cannot read the page, the result stays unknown.

  3. 03
    Limits belong in the open

    When a feature depends on another provider or stops short of a complete workflow, the page should say so.

Keep exploring

More on this part of the work

Browse all resources

Technical SEO guide

A good technical audit tells the team what to do next.

A practical technical SEO audit process for setting scope, checking crawl quality, prioritizing issues, planning fixes, and reporting results.

Workflow guide

Plan the audit around the handoffs where work usually gets lost.

Connect crawl findings, review, assignment, implementation, QA, and client reporting in one practical SEO audit process.

Prioritization guide

Severity matters, but it does not decide what your team should fix first.

Prioritize technical SEO findings by impact, reach, confidence, page value, implementation risk, and the effort required to check the fix.

See how it fits your team

Bring the crawl, the review, and the follow-up together.

Request access