Prioritization guide
Severity matters, but it does not decide what your team should fix first.
A crawler's severity label is only one input. Consider how many valuable pages are affected, how confident you are in the finding, what users or search engines experience, how far the change reaches, whether it is reversible, and how you will check the result.
| State | Evidence | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Found | Prioritization guideOriginal page and available evidence recorded | Audit |
| Reviewed | Decision recordedA person checked the target and proposed value | Human |
| Checked | Public page readLive result recorded separately | Netrix |
What to look for
Get the answer without losing sight of where it came from.
Make sure the issue is real
Sample the affected pages and test the check's interpretation before multiplying a false positive across the backlog.
Look at reach and page value
Separate a template-wide problem from an isolated low-value page, and give extra weight to pages central to discovery or conversion.
Account for the risk of the fix
A reversible metadata edit and a sitewide redirect rewrite should not go through the same approval process.
Put the guide to work
Understand the issue, check the page, and choose the next step.
The strongest audits leave room for context. Confirm what happened, rule out the common false positives, decide who owns the fix, and check the page again afterward.
Open the full check libraryMake sure the issue is real
Sample the affected pages and test the check's interpretation before multiplying a false positive across the backlog.
Look at reach and page value
Separate a template-wide problem from an isolated low-value page, and give extra weight to pages central to discovery or conversion.
Account for the risk of the fix
A reversible metadata edit and a sitewide redirect rewrite should not go through the same approval process.
From finding to follow-up
See where the work stands—and what still needs to happen.
- 01Found
Netrix records the page and the issue it found.
- 02Reviewed
Someone checks the finding in context.
- 03Approved
The right person chooses what should change.
- 04Applied
A supported connection accepts the change.
- 05Checked
Netrix reads the public page again.
- 06Shared
The report summarizes the audit and fixes currently marked applied.
A few things worth knowing
Netrix can prepare the work. Your team still makes the call.
- 01Nothing publishes itself
AI drafts and supported SEO changes wait for an authorized person to act.
- 02A write is not proof
Netrix records when a provider accepts a change, then checks the public page separately. If it cannot read the page, the result stays unknown.
- 03Limits belong in the open
When a feature depends on another provider or stops short of a complete workflow, the page should say so.
Keep exploring
More on this part of the work
Technical SEO guide
A good technical audit tells the team what to do next.
A practical technical SEO audit process for setting scope, checking crawl quality, prioritizing issues, planning fixes, and reporting results.
Workflow guide
Plan the audit around the handoffs where work usually gets lost.
Connect crawl findings, review, assignment, implementation, QA, and client reporting in one practical SEO audit process.
Remediation guide
SEO remediation is the point where advice becomes a production change.
Turn SEO recommendations into approved changes, check the live result, and report the outcome without skipping important steps.
See how it fits your team