Skip to content

Accessibility and SEO

Accessibility and SEO share markup, but they do not share the same goal.

Headings, alternative text, language, landmarks, labels, links, and document structure affect both machine interpretation and human use. Automated tests can catch specific conditions; they cannot certify accessibility or replace assistive-technology and expert review.

Request access Explore the platform
FIELD NOTE / GUIDEAccessibility and SEO
NETRIX
Evidence
01
Decision
02
Action
03
Proof
04

How the work moves

Observed100% Reviewed78% Applied52% Verified48%
Example statuses only. These numbers are not benchmarks or customer results.

What to look for

Get the answer without losing sight of where it came from.

01

Keep the findings in the right discipline

Present accessibility issues separately from SEO priorities while keeping the page context they share.

02

Explain what automation misses

A clean automated run does not prove that every person can use the experience.

03

Fix the element you actually tested

Use the selector and rendered page to make narrow attribute changes only when the correction is clear.

Put the guide to work

Understand the issue, check the page, and choose the next step.

The strongest audits leave room for context. Confirm what happened, rule out the common false positives, decide who owns the fix, and check the page again afterward.

Open the full check library
01

Keep the findings in the right discipline

Present accessibility issues separately from SEO priorities while keeping the page context they share.

02

Explain what automation misses

A clean automated run does not prove that every person can use the experience.

03

Fix the element you actually tested

Use the selector and rendered page to make narrow attribute changes only when the correction is clear.

From finding to follow-up

See where the work stands—and what still needs to happen.

  1. 01Found

    Netrix records the page and the issue it found.

  2. 02Reviewed

    Someone checks the finding in context.

  3. 03Approved

    The right person chooses what should change.

  4. 04Applied

    A supported connection accepts the change.

  5. 05Checked

    Netrix reads the public page again.

  6. 06Shared

    The report summarizes the audit and fixes currently marked applied.

A few things worth knowing

Netrix can prepare the work. Your team still makes the call.

  1. 01
    Nothing publishes itself

    AI drafts and supported SEO changes wait for an authorized person to act.

  2. 02
    A write is not proof

    Netrix records when a provider accepts a change, then checks the public page separately. If it cannot read the page, the result stays unknown.

  3. 03
    Limits belong in the open

    When a feature depends on another provider or stops short of a complete workflow, the page should say so.

Keep exploring

More on this part of the work

Browse all resources

Technical SEO guide

A good technical audit tells the team what to do next.

A practical technical SEO audit process for setting scope, checking crawl quality, prioritizing issues, planning fixes, and reporting results.

Workflow guide

Plan the audit around the handoffs where work usually gets lost.

Connect crawl findings, review, assignment, implementation, QA, and client reporting in one practical SEO audit process.

Prioritization guide

Severity matters, but it does not decide what your team should fix first.

Prioritize technical SEO findings by impact, reach, confidence, page value, implementation risk, and the effort required to check the fix.

See how it fits your team

Bring the crawl, the review, and the follow-up together.

Request access